Latest Updates
-
₹1000 Crore and Counting: ‘Dhurandhar 2’ Isn’t Just a Hit, It’s a Box Office Phenomenon -
Akshaya Tritiya 2026 Date: April 19 or 20? Know The Right Day To Buy Gold This Year -
From Water Fights to Egg Games: Unique Easter Monday Traditions Explained -
South Indian Perfect Texture Coconut Chutney Recipe -
Horoscope for Today April 06, 2026 - Practical Steps Bring Calm Progress -
Chana Masala Recipe: Experience Dhaba Style Authentic Taste -
Struggling With Oily Skin This Summer? Simple Tips to Keep Shine Under Control -
Garlic Bread Recipe: The Cheesy Bakery Style Trick You Need -
Soha Ali Khan Swears By This ‘Gentle Game-Changer’ Lemon Drink for Gut Health: Full Recipe Inside -
World Health Day 2026: You’re Not As Healthy As You Think—Here’s Why
Love : Universal Particular

Ordinarily love is mental, dualistic and particular. I love someone, some things and I hate some others, would rather not have anything to do with the person. Because now love is centred on 'I' and 'mine', based on attachments, based on the feeling of the other's dependence on us, on mutual need. Mother's love for her infant, helplessly dependent on her or that of a chaste wife for her husband who is the centre of her home, are cited as the best examples of individualized love. But all love is love though labeled a particular and universal. Love is common to both. It is heart based. Certainly love is many splendoured, unmatched in its beauty.
Where then is the difference? Attachment based love is by its very nature exclusive. It excludes from its ambit all that is not regarded as one's own, as belonging to one's family, one's social and spiritual circles and so on. Mind always puts brakes on the widening of this base. Superimposed is the society's value system and its permissive or prudish ways.
In contrast stands Sadguru Ramana's universal love which is surprisingly at the same time particular as well. Each and everyone could have his share of it. Monkeys would bring their babies to have his blessings in very much the same way as a human mother would.
'Nondi' the lame monkey tended by Ramana was not only welcomed back by his tribe but also made its chief. Normally they would excommunicate those who had been looked after by humans. Ramana had a thorough knowledge of the habits, behaviour patterns of monkeys and was very sensitive to their needs. Consequently the monkeys could identify themselves with him and feel that he was one of them. Cow Lakshmi would have full freedom to come to Ramana at any time for being caressed or consoled.
Subbaramayya, the author of 'Ramana Reminiscences' would be in continuous correspondence with Ramana reporting every little detail of his household. While at Sri Ramanasramam he would talk freely with Ramana as one would with one's own father. So too would the 'Diarist' Devaraja Mudaliar who would refer to himself as 'Ramanachei' or Ramana's child.
About the author
Sri A.R.Natarajan has had the opportunity of a long association of over 50 years with the Ramanashram. He was the editor of "Mountain Path" for two years. He was the secretary of Ramana Kendra, New Delhi for ten years. He founded the Ramana Maharshi centre for learning, a non profit institution. He has authored more than thirty six books and eleven pocket books on the life and teachings of Bhagavan Ramana.
Chat With The Devotees Of Bhagwan Ramana Maharishi



Click it and Unblock the Notifications











